Sample data, fictional company. Kalvenor Systems illustrates the report; it is not a client delivery.
An agency sees each client brand it manages, switches between them, and delivers every output under its own name.
Sample data, fictional company. Harbourline Partners is a fictional agency; Kalvenor Systems and Tessaro Group are fictional companies. This workspace exists only to show how an agency works with its client brands.
Harbourline Partners (sample agency)
Open a client brand: Kalvenor Systems (sample); Tessaro Group (Sample data, fictional company).
| Role | Reads | Changes |
|---|---|---|
| Owner | Every brand in the workspace | Everything the members can, and who belongs to the workspace, set up by Broadcastwell on request |
| Admin | Every brand in the workspace | Queues, tests, share links and alerts for every brand |
| Member | Every brand in the workspace | Queues, tests, share links and alerts for every brand |
| Client viewer | One brand only | Nothing: read only |
Reports, the one pager, battlecards and share links carry the agency's name and logo and no Broadcastwell name. Alert emails carry the agency's name; they are sent from Broadcastwell's own sending domain.
Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. Counts show their bases and dates. Below 30 observations, counts only; rates at 30 or more include a 95% interval.
Fictional sample. Every result in this section is invented.
What is field service management software? Five-engine question record: 5 of 5 answers available. These existing observations do not establish a rate.
2026-07-08T09:07:00.000Z; named: no; own site cited: no
Buyers asking "What is field service management software?" are most often pointed to Orbit Field. Kalvenor Systems is not named in this answer. The answer advises checking offline behaviour, contract length and data export before signing.
Receipt: sample:kalvenor:1:1|chatgpt
2026-07-08T09:07:00.000Z; named: yes; own site cited: no
Buyers asking "What is field service management software?" are most often pointed to Northvale FSM. Kalvenor Systems is named in this answer as an option for teams that need offline mobile work. The answer advises checking offline behaviour, contract length and data export before signing.
Receipt: sample:kalvenor:1:1|claude
2026-07-08T09:07:00.000Z; named: yes; own site cited: yes
Buyers asking "What is field service management software?" are most often pointed to Northvale FSM, Orbit Field. Kalvenor Systems is named in this answer as an option for teams that need offline mobile work. The answer advises checking offline behaviour, contract length and data export before signing. Kalvenor Systems has no route planning feature.
Receipt: sample:kalvenor:1:1|perplexity
2026-07-08T09:07:00.000Z; named: no; own site cited: no
Buyers asking "What is field service management software?" are most often pointed to Northvale FSM, Trakwell, Orbit Field. Kalvenor Systems is not named in this answer. The answer advises checking offline behaviour, contract length and data export before signing. Northvale FSM is described as a fit for large dispatch teams.
Receipt: sample:kalvenor:1:1|google_aio
2026-07-08T09:07:00.000Z; named: no; own site cited: no
Buyers asking "What is field service management software?" are most often pointed to Northvale FSM, Trakwell. Kalvenor Systems is not named in this answer. The answer advises checking offline behaviour, contract length and data export before signing. Northvale FSM is described as a fit for large dispatch teams.
Receipt: sample:kalvenor:1:1|google_ai_mode
Five answers, one per engine, one observation each. One observation is not a rate.
Fictional sample. Every result in this section is invented.
310 citations across 147 valid answers of 150 planned. Captured 2026-07-08, 2026-07-10, 2026-07-12. Unclassified pages remain other until reviewed.
| Source type | Engine | Citations | Base |
|---|---|---|---|
| your own site | ChatGPT | 7 | 60 |
| other companies' pages | ChatGPT | 33 | 60 |
| ranked lists | ChatGPT | 7 | 60 |
| media | ChatGPT | 0 | 60 |
| YouTube | ChatGPT | 0 | 60 |
| Reddit and forums | ChatGPT | 0 | 60 |
| Quora | ChatGPT | 0 | 60 |
| Wikipedia | ChatGPT | 0 | 60 |
| review sites | ChatGPT | 0 | 60 |
| other | ChatGPT | 13 | 60 |
| your own site | Claude | 3 | 70 |
| other companies' pages | Claude | 38 | 70 |
| ranked lists | Claude | 2 | 70 |
| media | Claude | 0 | 70 |
| YouTube | Claude | 0 | 70 |
| Reddit and forums | Claude | 0 | 70 |
| Quora | Claude | 0 | 70 |
| Wikipedia | Claude | 0 | 70 |
| review sites | Claude | 0 | 70 |
| other | Claude | 27 | 70 |
| your own site | Perplexity | 3 | 66 |
| other companies' pages | Perplexity | 36 | 66 |
| ranked lists | Perplexity | 5 | 66 |
| media | Perplexity | 0 | 66 |
| YouTube | Perplexity | 0 | 66 |
| Reddit and forums | Perplexity | 0 | 66 |
| Quora | Perplexity | 0 | 66 |
| Wikipedia | Perplexity | 0 | 66 |
| review sites | Perplexity | 0 | 66 |
| other | Perplexity | 22 | 66 |
| your own site | Google AI Overviews | 0 | 54 |
| other companies' pages | Google AI Overviews | 27 | 54 |
| ranked lists | Google AI Overviews | 5 | 54 |
| media | Google AI Overviews | 0 | 54 |
| YouTube | Google AI Overviews | 0 | 54 |
| Reddit and forums | Google AI Overviews | 0 | 54 |
| Quora | Google AI Overviews | 0 | 54 |
| Wikipedia | Google AI Overviews | 0 | 54 |
| review sites | Google AI Overviews | 0 | 54 |
| other | Google AI Overviews | 22 | 54 |
| your own site | Google AI Mode | 5 | 60 |
| other companies' pages | Google AI Mode | 33 | 60 |
| ranked lists | Google AI Mode | 2 | 60 |
| media | Google AI Mode | 0 | 60 |
| YouTube | Google AI Mode | 0 | 60 |
| Reddit and forums | Google AI Mode | 0 | 60 |
| Quora | Google AI Mode | 0 | 60 |
| Wikipedia | Google AI Mode | 0 | 60 |
| review sites | Google AI Mode | 0 | 60 |
| other | Google AI Mode | 20 | 60 |
| your own site | All five engines | 18 | 310 |
| other companies' pages | All five engines | 167 | 310 |
| ranked lists | All five engines | 21 | 310 |
| media | All five engines | 0 | 310 |
| YouTube | All five engines | 0 | 310 |
| Reddit and forums | All five engines | 0 | 310 |
| Quora | All five engines | 0 | 310 |
| Wikipedia | All five engines | 0 | 310 |
| review sites | All five engines | 0 | 310 |
| other | All five engines | 104 | 310 |
When most citations point to other companies' pages or ranked lists, start by checking those pages. When most point to your own pages, start there.
Fictional sample. Every result in this section is invented.
Each list needs a dated manual presence check. Base: 147 valid answers. Captured 2026-07-08, 2026-07-10, 2026-07-12
A ranked list cited in n of N answers is a documented source to check. A citation does not reveal the order in which an engine read pages.
Fictional sample. Every result in this section is invented.
Competitor pages cited in the existing answers. Read beside the named-instead and displacement views. Captured 2026-07-08, 2026-07-10, 2026-07-12
Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking.
Fictional sample. Every result in this section is invented.
5 statements checked against approved facts. Five invented classifications illustrate the form, separate from the 147 valid sample answers. An Audit reviews a sample of 25 adverse cells with two people; no such review is claimed for this illustration.
We list the statements and their sources; we do not guess intent.
Fictional sample. Every result in this section is invented.
Wikipedia article, major press, funding record and directory presence are checked on a stated date. A named-company band is printed only when the published Index rule and record establish it.
Public presence supplies context. It is not product quality or a promise of improvement.
Fictional sample. Every result in this section is invented.
Chosen country: United States. Declared location and network country are separate observations. Country results are not pooled.
A result without a stated location is not a result. Countries are reported separately.
Fictional sample. Every result in this section is invented.
Seven parts, each reported separately.
| Part | Observation | Base and date |
|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 47 of 147 (32%; 95% interval 25% to 39.9%) | Captured 2026-07-08, 2026-07-10, 2026-07-12 |
| Context exposure | Not measured | We do not see the engines' retrieval. |
| Citation | 17 of 147 (11.6%; 95% interval 7.3% to 17.7%) | Captured 2026-07-08, 2026-07-10, 2026-07-12 |
| Prominence | Illustrative annotation: first named in 1 of 5 reviewed answers; in the list in 2 of 5; mentioned only in 2 of 5. | Captured 2026-07-08, 2026-07-10, 2026-07-12 |
| Absorption | Illustrative count: 3 approved facts in 5 reviewed statements. | Captured 2026-07-08, 2026-07-10, 2026-07-12 |
| Fidelity | supported: 1 of 5 statements; wrong context: 1 of 5 statements; outdated claim: 1 of 5 statements; incorrect brand association: 1 of 5 statements; misattribution: 1 of 5 statements | Captured 2026-07-08, 2026-07-10, 2026-07-12 |
| Behaviour | Not measured | No analytics supplied. A citation is not a lead. |
One number hides the gap. These seven parts are never combined.
Fictional sample. Every result in this section is invented.
Fictional illustration of the four checks on one page. This is not a completed twenty-page watch.
Correction: None in this fictional example. Checked 2026-07-13.
We detect and defend. We never plant instructions or false claims.
Sample built from Absence Index release 2026-09 answers captured 22 to 23 Sep 2026 under method v1.1. This is a construction category example. The paid Checklist Audit is retired as of 26 October 2026. These 25 answers remain a historical sample.
Prepared by the Broadcastwell team. Team review: in progress.
Our construction category example shows 44 criteria from 25 existing answers across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode. The full report includes five published Fieldwire capabilities, the mapping notes, repeated observations and 25 source receipts.
| Criterion | Count | 95 percent interval |
|---|---|---|
| Change order tracking and approval Team review: in progress. | 7 of 25 | 14.3 to 47.6 percent |
| Construction workflow tracking for RFIs, submittals and field reports Team review: in progress. | 6 of 25 | 11.5 to 43.4 percent |
| An interface field and office staff can use easily Team review: in progress. | 5 of 25 | 8.9 to 39.1 percent |
| Integration with existing accounting and project systems Team review: in progress. | 5 of 25 | 8.9 to 39.1 percent |
| Job cost and budget tracking Team review: in progress. | 5 of 25 | 8.9 to 39.1 percent |
Read the full Checklist sample and all 25 receipts
26 October 2026: the Checklist Audit is retired. Current scopes and prices.
Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.
Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.