Public Fix

Broadcastwell LLC, day 2 of 30

The whole run: day 0 record, plan and log. Live

Delivery lead: Priya Nair, Management Consultant.

Day 2 of 30, 16 Oct 2026

Day 2: an approved client result on our answer pages

Day 2 of 30. One change went live since the day 1 entry. The approved result from Vantaa Tax, an existing client, is now published on our company facts page and on each of the five answer pages. It is stated as approved: on a fixed ten-question benchmark re-measured over 28 days, the tracked AI visibility index for Vantaa Tax went from 100 to approximately 112. It is early and directional, a measure of tracked AI visibility only, and no outcome is promised. We fetched all six pages again today, signed out, and the paragraph is served on each:

In progress: requests to the authors of five agency lists the engines cited are drafted and held for a final review; each one appears here once it is sent. Nothing in this entry changes a day 0 number. This week's observation, one run and not the measurement, on the same ten questions, appears in a later entry once it has been checked. The day 30 measurement uses the same ten questions on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode.

What we changed

  • Approved client result (Vantaa Tax) on company facts and the five answer pages. Where: broadcastwell.com. By: our team. Live.
  • Requests to the authors of five cited agency lists. Where: five third party list pages. By: our team. Drafted.

What is next

  • Send the five list requests and report each one here once sent.
  • This week's observation, one run and not the measurement, on the same ten questions.

Receipts quoted: F0-19. Find them in the day 0 receipts.

At day 30 we schedule the same ten buyer questions on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, three runs, 150 planned observations, under method v1.1. The three measured rates are named count, cited-as-a-source count and record accuracy. Named and cited counts compare the same question, engine and run cells answered in both measurements; a cell lost on either side is excluded from both. An increase in either measured count passes; a tie does not. Record accuracy compares wrong or stale totals only when reviewed statement sets from one existing Sprint link to the same company and both measurements; only statements within the common cells count. A lower reviewed total passes. If no measured rate passes and those reviewed sets are unavailable, the result stays in review. The common valid base, exclusions and receipts are reported separately.