Public Fix

Broadcastwell LLC, day 9 of 30

The whole run: day 0 record, plan and log. Live

Delivery lead: Priya Nair, Management Consultant.

Day 9 of 30, 23 Oct 2026

Day 9: one more list request sent, this week's observation running

Day 9 of 30. Today our team sent one more request to the author of an agency list the engines cited in the day 0 answers: https://danishleadco.io/blog/ai-search-visibility-agencies-for-b2b-companies . The site's team replied the same morning and passed the request to the article's author. Nothing was paid, and the list does not include us yet. A second request went in through the contact form of https://www.webdesignrankings.com/best-ai-search-companies ; the form showed no confirmation, so we count it as in progress, not sent.

That makes requests to the authors of eight cited list pages. Each author decides, and a list shows here as changed only once we read it listing us. Two cited pages still have no route to an author.

We fetched our company facts page and the five answer pages again today at 19:07 UTC, signed out, and all six are served with the approved client result.

This week's observation started today: one run, not the measurement, on the same ten questions across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode. Its counts are added to this entry once the run has been checked. Nothing in this entry changes a day 0 number.

What we changed

  • Listing request to the list author. Where: danishleadco.io. By: our team. Sent to the company for approval.
  • Listing request through the contact form, delivery not confirmed. Where: webdesignrankings.com. By: our team. Drafted.

What is next

  • Add this week's observation counts here once the run has been checked.
  • Report each list here once we read it listing us.

Receipts quoted: F0-04, F0-09. Find them in the day 0 receipts.

At day 30 we schedule the same ten buyer questions on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode, three runs, 150 planned observations, under method v1.1. The three measured rates are named count, cited-as-a-source count and record accuracy. Named and cited counts compare the same question, engine and run cells answered in both measurements; a cell lost on either side is excluded from both. An increase in either measured count passes; a tie does not. Record accuracy compares wrong or stale totals only when reviewed statement sets from one existing Sprint link to the same company and both measurements; only statements within the common cells count. A lower reviewed total passes. If no measured rate passes and those reviewed sets are unavailable, the result stays in review. The common valid base, exclusions and receipts are reported separately.